<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shiny Things &#187; Google Reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewgrant.org/tag/google-reader/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewgrant.org</link>
	<description>Andrew Grant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:37:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A useful, yet undocumented, shortcut for Google Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/12/12/a-useful-yet-undocumented-shortcut-for-google-reader.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/12/12/a-useful-yet-undocumented-shortcut-for-google-reader.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 21:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/12/12/a-useful-yet-undocumented-shortcut-for-google-reader.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning, while reading (J,J,J,K-ing) through Google Reader,&#160;my girlfriend&#8217;s cat (Tigger) decided to walk across my keyboard to get a better look at the buttery muffin next to me.
As he did so,&#160;the left-hand menu vanished and the reading pane maximized to fill the remaining space &#8211; a layout I wish for everytime I&#160;use Reader&#160;on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning, while reading (J,J,J,K-ing) through Google Reader,&nbsp;my girlfriend&#8217;s cat (Tigger) decided to walk across my keyboard to get a better look at the buttery muffin next to me.</p>
<p>As he did so,&nbsp;the left-hand menu vanished and the reading pane maximized to fill the remaining space &#8211; a layout I wish for everytime I&nbsp;use Reader&nbsp;on the 1024&#215;600 screen of my laptop!</p>
<p>After rechecking&nbsp;the list of <a href="http://www.google.com/help/reader/faq.html#shortcuts" target="_blank">shortcuts</a>&nbsp;for Google Reader, some methodical pressing revealed&nbsp;the unlisted key in question &#8211; u.</p>
<p align="center"><img height="158" alt="Reader with left-pane" src="http://www.andrewgrant.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/WindowsLiveWriter/AusefulyetundocumentedshortcutforGoogleR_BAA3/rsc_1%5B6%5D.jpg" width="200"> <img height="158" alt="Reader without pane" src="http://www.andrewgrant.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/12/WindowsLiveWriter/AusefulyetundocumentedshortcutforGoogleR_BAA3/rsc_2%5B8%5D.jpg" width="200"> </p>
<p>On large screens the difference isn&#8217;t as pronounced, but on smaller laptops or tablets, hiding the left-pane increases the reading space anywhere from 25-50%. </p>
<p>Thanks Tigger!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/12/12/a-useful-yet-undocumented-shortcut-for-google-reader.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Reader changes</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/11/28/google-reader-changes.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/11/28/google-reader-changes.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewgrant.org/1969/12/31/google-reader-changes.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve noticed that regardless of how the subscription occurred, Google Reader now allows you to&#160;assign your new feed to a folder. When this feature was first added it worked only for for feeds added within Reader,&#160;a method I found I&#160;barely used. I&#8217;m sure most people subscribe to feeds they stumble upon in their browser so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that regardless of how the subscription occurred, Google Reader now allows you to&nbsp;assign your new feed to a folder. When this feature was first added it worked only for for feeds added within Reader,&nbsp;a method I found I&nbsp;barely used. I&#8217;m sure most people subscribe to feeds they stumble upon in their browser so this change is very welcome.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great that the team keep adding these little fixes and enhancements, but I do wish there was an official change-log somewhere <img src='http://www.andrewgrant.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  In past updates there have been some nice little things tweaked that I&#8217;ve completely missed until finding them while changing another setting!</p>
<p>Over the Thanksgiving break I spent some time trying out the mobile version of Google Reader on my T-Mobile MDA, via both Wi-Fi and GPRS. It&#8217;s an impressive and clean frontend, but unfortunately there are a few minor design flaws that can make the experience a little cumbersome.</p>
<p><span id="more-124"></span>
<p>Firstly, although you can view a paginated&nbsp;list of items there is no way to mark this visible list as read. Items are only marked as read once individually viewed. While this is fine for certain feeds,&nbsp;in most cases&nbsp;I want to be able to skim through these pages, stopping only&nbsp;to view posts with subjects that catch my eye.</p>
<p>On a similar theme; In the single-item view the links that take you to the next unread item are unfortunately placed at the bottom of the page.&nbsp;This means you may have to skip through several pages before you can use these links. On devices that use the jog button to both scroll and highlight links, that&nbsp;can be a heck of a lot of clicks for a good sized post.</p>
<p>There are a few other minor quirks, but these are the two that really slowed me down. Still, as an early effort it&#8217;s not bad at all. I believe there are some mobile feed readers out there that are probably better, but I doubt their non-mobile versions would be enough to tempt me from Google Reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/11/28/google-reader-changes.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello del.icio.us</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/11/24/hello-delicious.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/11/24/hello-delicious.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 21:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[del.ico.us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/11/24/hello-delicious.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah I know, I&#8217;m late to the del.icio.us party. 
When I started using Google Reader I found&#160;the &#8216;Starred&#8217; and &#8221;Shared&#8217; lists a great way to save&#160;or republish interesting links. Those starred items soon mount up though, and because there&#8217;s no way to categorize them&#160;you soon amass a large&#160;unsortable and unsearchable&#160;collection of links. 
The &#8216;Shared Items&#8217; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I know, I&#8217;m late to the del.icio.us party. </p>
<p>When I started using Google Reader I found&nbsp;the &#8216;Starred&#8217; and &#8221;Shared&#8217; lists a great way to save&nbsp;or <a href="http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/10/16/how-to-fix-google-readers-shared-items-for-publishing.html" target="_blank">republish interesting links</a>. Those starred items soon mount up though, and because there&#8217;s no way to categorize them&nbsp;you soon amass a large&nbsp;unsortable and unsearchable&nbsp;collection of links. </p>
<p>The &#8216;Shared Items&#8217; list is also a great feature.&nbsp;Subscribe to the shared item feeds of a&nbsp;couple of good bloggers, such as <a href="http://scobleizer.com" target="_blank">Robert Scoble</a>,&nbsp;and and your interesting-items-to-feeds ratio shoots up. Using JavaScript you can even embed your shared item list into your webpage to be shared with visitors. </p>
<p>However, after a while I found an increasing desire to save and share links that I was finding outside of Google Reader, and in some cases to add a line or two of commentary.</p>
<p>Enter del.icio.us.</p>
<p><span id="more-122"></span>
<p>For those not in the know, del.icio.us is a social bookmarking site that allows users to collect, categorize, and share links. For example, here&#8217;s my <a href="http://del.icio.us/andrewgrant" target="_blank">bookmark page</a> than can be publicly viewed or subscribed to.&nbsp;With just a few clicks, it&#8217;s easy to find pages&nbsp;from users with similar interests. </p>
<p>Like Google Readers Shared Items, these links can be both embedded in a webpage&nbsp;or subscribed to in an RSS reader. I still prefer using FeedBurner to create and manage the embedded links as it offers greater control over content and formatting, but the standard options are nearly as good.&nbsp;</p>
<p>del.icio.us also has a feature that will post all new links to your blog at the end of each day. Handy for people who are subscribed to your blog via a feed and would otherwise miss the embedded links.</p>
<p>Best of all, installing the del.icio.us toolbar for Firefox or IE makes collecting links a simple two-click process. True, this is one click more than required by Google Reader, but that additional click lets you categorize or comment on the link.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using&nbsp;del.icio.us to drive the external links pane on my site for a few weeks now and it beats Google Reader hands-down. I wonder, will people introduced to these concepts by Google Reader eventually switch as they seek more control and features?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/11/24/hello-delicious.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to fix Google Reader&#8217;s Shared Items for your website</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/10/16/how-to-fix-google-readers-shared-items-for-publishing.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/10/16/how-to-fix-google-readers-shared-items-for-publishing.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/10/16/how-to-fix-google-readers-shared-items-for-publishing.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Update: The original bug has now been fixed. I also noticed Johnny K figured out the code required to remove the styling. However, I prefer the output and options offered by FeedBurner so I&#8217;m going to stick with my method).
When I started using Google Reader I saw a really nice feature that I was keen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(<strong>Update: </strong>The original bug has <a target="_blank" href="http://googlereader.blogspot.com/2006/10/bug-swatting.html">now been fixed</a>. I also noticed Johnny K <a target="_blank" href="http://www.keyes.ie/johnnyk/2006/10/19/google-reader-shared-clip/">figured out</a> the code required to remove the styling. However, I prefer the output and options offered by FeedBurner so I&#8217;m going to stick with my method).</p>
<p>When I started using Google Reader I saw a really nice feature that I was keen to use; Shared Items. For each news item Google Reader provides a &#8220;share&#8221; button that when clicked adds the item to a public page belonging to the user. For example, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/reader/shared/07934286816399726135">here&#8217;s mine</a>. Users may create multiple pages for different categories and share their pages with family and friends. They may also incorporate the these items on their own pages by including Google-provided JavaScript.</p>
<p>It was this last feature that I was most interested in. Before now, items in my &#8220;Shared News&#8221; list have been manually created using mini-blog entries with a special category and some custom code. I thought that by switching to Google Reader&#8217;s Shared Items I would save myself a great deal of time &#8211; while reading feeds it would only take a single button click to publish items of interest to my shared page. Cool!</p>
<p>However; Although it was easy to use the JavaScript provided by Google Reader to display my shared items, giving them a look and feel consistent with the rest of my main page proved to be virtually impossible.</p>
<p><span id="more-106"></span></p>
<p>Google Reader offers several pre-canned color options for published news items. Amongst these is a &#8216;none&#8217; option that, I assume, is intended to emit the list of items using only HTML tags. Unfortunately selecting this option has no effect on the JavaScript that&#8217;s generated, and attempting to manually tweak the code to use the &#8216;none&#8217; style results in the list of items failing to display. While it&#8217;s possible to modify aspects of the provided styles via CSS and judicious use of the &#8216;!important&#8217; tag, others style attributes seem impossible to change.</p>
<p>Luckily there&#8217;s an easy workaround using <a target="_blank" href="http://www.feedburner.com">FeedBurner</a> and only a little effort. In about 10 minutes you&#8217;ll be able to include Google Reader&#8217;s Shared Items on your site with any CSS you desire.</p>
<ol>
<li>Add the RSS Feed from your Shared Items to a new or existing FeedBurner account.</li>
<li>Within FeedBurner, from the &#8216;Publicize&#8217; menu select BuzzBoost and choose the display options you desire.</li>
<li>Paste the JavaScript from BuzzBoost into your webpage and use the provided <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.feedburner.com/help/buzzboost/using_buzzboost/popup/">guide</a> to customize the appearance. Wrapping the items in a specific div and modifying the header and ul/li tags takes care of most of the work.</li>
<li>Should you wish to hide the FeedBurner icon at the bottom of the list, simply add the &#8216;display:none;&#8217; attribute to the img tag within your Shared Items div.</li>
</ol>
<p>Voila!</p>
<div id="shorts_content" class="content_box"><script type="text/javascript" /></div>
<p>I'm sure the Google Reader team will address the problems with the Shared Items formatting sometime in the future, but given the (surprising) lack of comments about this on the Google Reader Groups I'm not sure what the priority will be in the great scheme of things. In the meantime it's nice to have an easy to implement workaround for a great feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/10/16/how-to-fix-google-readers-shared-items-for-publishing.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye FeedDemon, hello Google Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/10/14/goodbye-feeddemon-hello-google-reader.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/10/14/goodbye-feeddemon-hello-google-reader.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FeedDemon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsgator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/10/14/goodbye-feeddemon-hello-google-reader.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I discovered the benefits of using RSS/Atom Feeds over two years ago. Feeds are a method by&#160;which users may subscribe to&#160;websites and have the latest content delivered to them, without the need to visit&#160;the sites in question. If you read a number of websites the main&#160; benefits&#160;are two-fold; Not only is content delivered to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 10px" height="64" src="http://www.andrewgrant.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/WindowsLiveWriter/GoodbyeFeedDemonhelloGoogleReader_9D10/rss-feed-icon%5B14%5D.png" width="64" align="right"> I discovered the benefits of using RSS/Atom Feeds over two years ago. Feeds are a method by&nbsp;which users may subscribe to&nbsp;websites and have the latest content delivered to them, without the need to visit&nbsp;the sites in question. If you read a number of websites the main&nbsp; benefits&nbsp;are two-fold; Not only is content delivered to you as it is created, but you do not&nbsp;waste time visiting sites that have not been updated. Using Feeds I found I was able to read about more topics that interest me in a far shorter time.</p>
<p>After trying various ways of reading feeds&nbsp;I eventually settled on a combination of&nbsp;FeedDemon&nbsp;and NewsGator Online. FeedDemon was&nbsp;fast&nbsp;and efficient, the synchronization via NewsGator Online meant that items read on my home PC were marked as read on my work PC, and vice-versa. I could also use the NewsGator Online website to check feeds from any webbrowser.</p>
<p><a href="http://reader.google.com" target="_blank">Google Reader</a>, a web-based solution,&nbsp;was one of the products I passed over in favor of FeedDemon. When the Google Reader team <a href="http://googlereader.blogspot.com/2006/09/something-looks-different.html" target="_blank">released a new version</a>&nbsp;at the end of last month I&nbsp;decided to try it out for a few days. Exporting/importing OPML feeds makes it easy to try out different readers without the need to recreate&nbsp;subscriptions. </p>
<p>My &#8216;few days&#8217; has&nbsp;almost become&nbsp;three weeks, and&nbsp;I&nbsp;find it hard to imagine going back to FeedDemon and NewsGator.</p>
<p><span id="more-105"></span>
<p>The interface of Google Reader makes browsing new items a quick and streamlined process. The &#8220;river of news&#8221; view, where content from all feeds is mixed into one list, is something Google Reader does a lot better than FeedDemon.&nbsp;I especially like the way items are marked as read once scrolled past -&nbsp;removing the need to manually mark items or feeds as read is a welcome change. There&#8217;s also a form of &#8220;smart sort&#8221;, where items from less regularly updated feeds appear higher in the list of new content.</p>
<p>One of the features I most like about Google Reader is something that FeedDemon has long lacked; the ability to &#8216;Clip&#8217;, or in Reader terminology, &#8216;Star&#8217;, items for later reading, and to have this synchronized across different machines. NewsGator Online, the&nbsp;synchronization backbone of FeedDemon, supports this yet the the FeedDemon client does not. Along with proper folder hierarchies for Feeds this is one of the most often and&nbsp;long-requested features for FeedDemon.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also the matter of cost; Whereas Google Reader is free FeedDemon costs a one-off payment of&nbsp;$30 for the current version, with&nbsp;synchronization&nbsp;via NewsGator Online costing an additional $20 annually. In my opinion FeedDemon is certainly not $50 better value&nbsp;than Google Reader. Should Google start exposing an API for Google Reader to allow integration with third-party applications or webpages then NewsGator may well find itself in a sticky situation.</p>
<p>So if you&#8217;re using FeedDemon, or a different RSS/Atom reader then I really do recommend checking out Google Reader. I think you&#8217;ll be impressed. And if you&#8217;ve never tried using NewsFeeds, then now&#8217;s the time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2006/10/14/goodbye-feeddemon-hello-google-reader.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
