<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shiny Things &#187; WHS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewgrant.org/tag/whs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewgrant.org</link>
	<description>Andrew Grant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:37:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Building a Windows Home Server &#8211; Part 1: Hardware Choices</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2007/04/06/building-a-windows-home-server-part-1-hardware-choices.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2007/04/06/building-a-windows-home-server-part-1-hardware-choices.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 01:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Home Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Media Center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewgrant.org/2007/04/06/building-a-windows-home-server-part-1-hardware-choices.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ According to statistics one in five PCs will suffer a fatal hard drive failure in their lifetime. Last week our Media Center was one of them. 
Fortunately&#160;it was the disk containing the OS and not the larger disk that holds all of our media. And while it did take 6-7 hours to reinstall and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img height="120" alt="Windows Home Server" src="http://www.andrewgrant.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/WindowsLiveWriter/BuildingaWindowsHomeServerPart1HardwareC_B61B/case13.jpg" width="160" align="right"> According to statistics one in five PCs will suffer a fatal hard drive failure in their lifetime. Last week our Media Center was one of them. </p>
<p>Fortunately&nbsp;it was the disk containing the OS and not the larger disk that holds all of our media. And while it did take 6-7 hours to reinstall and set everything up again, it would have&nbsp;been far more painful had it been my main PC or my girlfriend&#8217;s laptop. With those machines there&#8217;s also&nbsp;a pretty good chance we&#8217;d have lost something more&nbsp;important than just our TV recording schedule.</p>
<p>Before now my backup strategy&nbsp;was to keep mirrored copies of important files on seperate computers via FolderShare. This prevented us from losing&nbsp;our documents, photos or music, but it didn&#8217;t guard against disk failure or an accidental overwrite. I thought it best to take the Media Center failure as a warning shot from fate and move to&nbsp;a better backup strategy.</p>
<p>Enter Windows Home Server. </p>
<p>I received an invite to the Windows Home Server beta a few weeks ago so now seemed&nbsp;like the perfect time to&nbsp;try it out.&nbsp;My aim was to build a WHS machine that would run nightly backups of our three machines, and act as a centralized storage location for all of our media and some large datasets that I use for work.</p>
<p>Over the next week or so I&#8217;m going to write about&nbsp;actually setting up and configuring the machine, using it to backup our PCs (including my girlfriends Mac), and&nbsp;integrating&nbsp;the shared&nbsp;media&nbsp;with our Media Center PC. </p>
<p>However this first post is about&nbsp;choosing the best hardware configuration for Windows Home Server, something I spent considerable time researching.</p>
<p><span id="more-153"></span>
<p>The budget <strike>I set</strike> my girlfriend set was $600 all-in, which allowing for tax and shipping left $525 for actual components. This is more than I&nbsp;expect many&nbsp;prebuilt machines&nbsp;will retail for when Windows Home Server is released, but I was aiming for a spec quite a bit higher than the entry-level requirements.</p>
<p>There were a few factors to consider when building our Windows Home Server. Firstly&nbsp;our&nbsp;media library is around 200GB,&nbsp;50GB of which are photos and music we&#8217;d hate to lose. The combined disk sizes of the machines we&#8217;ll be backing up is another 200GB. Our server is going to be on 24/7 so energy consumption is something to consider, and while it&#8217;s going to live in a cupboard in the office/guest-bedroom it still needs to be relatively quiet.</p>
<p>With&nbsp;all this in mind here are the parts I chose, followed by the thought process behind each.</p>
<ul>
<li>AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ &#8220;Brisbane&#8221; ($89.00)
<li>GIGABYTE GA-M61PM-S2&nbsp;Motherboard ($69.99)
<li>1GB A-DATA&nbsp;DDR2 800 RAM ($68.99)
<li>LITE-ON IDE DVD-ROM Drive ($17.99)
<li>Rosewill R6421-P ATX Mid-Tower Case ($15.99)
<li>SeaSonic 330W Power Supply ($69.99)
<li>2&nbsp;x Seagate Barracuda 400GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drives ($199.98)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong></strong>&nbsp;Total: $521.93 before tax and storage.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ &#8220;Brisbane&#8221;</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103046" target="_new" atomicselection="true"><img height="75" alt="AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ &quot;Brisbane&quot;" src="http://www.andrewgrant.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/WindowsLiveWriter/BuildingaWindowsHomeServerPart1HardwareC_B61B/19103774022.jpg" width="100" align="right"></a> For a&nbsp;server power and heat are important considerations, and in my opinion AMD chips have a better&nbsp;price/performance/heat ratio than their&nbsp;Intel equivalents. After some research&nbsp;I decided upon an&nbsp;Athlon 64&nbsp;X2 3600+ from the&nbsp;&#8221;Brisbane&#8221; family. This is a dual-core 65nm chip with a max power rating of 65 Watts. </p>
<p>I did consider a chip from the&nbsp;&#8221;Lima&#8221; family, which are single-core versions with a higher clock speed and lower power consumption,&nbsp;but the difference was less than $10 and in a server I&#8217;d prefer two slower cores than a single fast one.</p>
<p><strong>GIGABYTE GA-M61PM-S2</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128029" target="_new" atomicselection="true"><img height="93" alt="GIGABYTE GA-M61PM-S2" src="http://www.andrewgrant.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/WindowsLiveWriter/BuildingaWindowsHomeServerPart1HardwareC_B61B/gigabyte_gam61pm_s2_profilethumb2.jpg" width="100" align="right"></a> For WHS&nbsp;I wanted a motherboard with integrated graphics and Gigabit LAN. It also needed to be Socket AM2 for my Athlon, and support DDR800 dual channel memory.</p>
<p>For once I wasn&#8217;t concerned about the number of PCI/PCI-E slots, but I did want support&nbsp;for at&nbsp;least four SATA drives.&nbsp;I&#8217;d be starting with two HDDs so I wanted&nbsp;a degree of upgradability without the need for an additional controller card.</p>
<p>Putting these requirements into newegg&#8217;s Power Search, the result was the GIGABYTE GA-M61PM-S2. It was the cheapest,&nbsp;had a lot of good comments, and I&#8217;ve never had a bad experience with a Gigabyte board so I popped it in the cart and moved on.</p>
<p><strong>1GB A-DATA&nbsp;DDR2 800 RAM</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820211066" target="_new" atomicselection="true"><img height="75" alt="1GB A-DATA DDR2 800 RAM" src="http://www.andrewgrant.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/WindowsLiveWriter/BuildingaWindowsHomeServerPart1HardwareC_B61B/20211013032.jpg" width="100" align="right"></a> The minimum requirement for WHS is 512MB RAM, but 1GB&nbsp;is a better amount if you&#8217;re going to be streaming data or using indexing. I also wanted two sticks for&nbsp;Dual Channel performance&nbsp;and the difference between 2&#215;256 and 2&#215;512 was only $30.</p>
<p><strong>LITE-ON IDE DVD-ROM Drive</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827106066" target="_new" atomicselection="true"><img height="75" alt="LITE-ON IDE DVD-ROM Drive" src="http://www.andrewgrant.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/WindowsLiveWriter/BuildingaWindowsHomeServerPart1HardwareC_B61B/27106066022.jpg" width="100" align="right"></a> The easiest choice of all since the only reason I need a DVD-ROM is to install Windows Home Server DVD and drivers. I picked the cheapest I could find, making sure it was IDE so as to not use one of my four SATA slots.</p>
<p><strong>Rosewill R6421-P ATX Mid-Tower Case</strong> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s ironic that&nbsp;I spent the most time choosing the case since it&#8217;s going to be sitting in a cupboard. I&#8217;d have loved a&nbsp;shuttle-sized server, but with the amount of storage I expect to use I decided upon a Mid-Tower with room for at least four internal 3.5&#8243; drives. I ignored cases that came with a Power Supply. They can look like a great deal but the PSU&#8217;s are invariably low quality and noisy.</p>
<p>The Rosewill was one of the cheaper cases I saw. It looked good and had some very positive buyer feedback so I took a $15 dollar gamble which definitely paid off.</p>
<p><strong>SeaSonic 330W Power Supply</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817151021" target="_new" atomicselection="true"><img height="75" alt="SeaSonic 330W Power Supply" src="http://www.andrewgrant.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/WindowsLiveWriter/BuildingaWindowsHomeServerPart1HardwareC_B61B/17151021155.jpg" width="100" align="right"></a> At $70&nbsp;the SeaSonic isn&#8217;t cheap for a 330W PSU, it is however utterly silent.</p>
<p>I bought the same unit when building my Media Center and was&nbsp;very happy with it. The first time&nbsp;I switched it on I actually started to check whether it was plugged in &#8211; it&#8217;s that quiet.</p>
<p><strong>2&nbsp;x Seagate Barracuda 400GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drives</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148246" target="_new" atomicselection="true"><img height="85" alt=" Seagate Barracuda 7200.9 ST3400833AS" src="http://www.andrewgrant.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/WindowsLiveWriter/BuildingaWindowsHomeServerPart1HardwareC_B61B/22148246013.jpg" width="100" align="right"></a> I decided early on that I would settle on&nbsp;specs for the server then spend the rest of my budget on the two biggest HDDs I could afford. </p>
<p>Because&nbsp;I wanted to&nbsp;use WHS&#8217;s&nbsp;data replication feature&nbsp;I needed two disks roughly equivalent in size. Two 500GB drives would have put me&nbsp;over budget&nbsp;so I went for the next size down, 400GB.</p>
<p>With one drive being used for data replication, 400GB may seem a little tight to store 200GB of media files and backup 200GB of data from other PCs. However, WHS employs &#8220;Single Instance Storage&#8221; for backups&nbsp;where identical clusters on a drive are only stored once. Not only does this massively reduce the amount of space needed to backup a machine, but additional backups require radically less space.</p>
<p><strong></strong>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Potential Savings</strong></p>
<p>If my budget had been lower there&#8217;s a few changes I&#8217;d have made.&nbsp;First to go would have been the SeaSonic power supply, for $25 you can get a great,&nbsp;though not silent,&nbsp;350/400W PSU. </p>
<p>Moving to 512MB of RAM would have saved about $30, and a mid-spec Semperon a further $40. Buying&nbsp;a motherboard from a less well known manufacturer, or with less SATA connectors, could have saved another $30.</p>
<p>Moving to two 320GB&nbsp;or 250GB drives would have saved around $40 and $60 respectively. I could also have bought a single HDD and used any external drives I might have lying around.</p>
<p>Finally there&#8217;s the DVD-ROM. Since the only need for this is to install Windows Home Server I could have used the drive&nbsp;from my main machine temporarily to save another $18.</p>
<p>&nbsp;<strong>Summary</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear that for as little as $400 you can build a&nbsp;perfectly capable Windows Home Server with dual drives &#8211; and of course this can be reduced further if you have unused hardware to begin with.</p>
<p>Everyone&#8217;s needs are different though. While these specs are&nbsp;great for me your needs may be slightly different. What would you change, and why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewgrant.org/2007/04/06/building-a-windows-home-server-part-1-hardware-choices.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
